Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 25.06.2025 01:00
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Procter & Gamble says it will cut 7,000 jobs over the next 2 years - CBS News
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
What movies and TV shows portray realistic beauty standards?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
What do you think of the Quora group "It's Ok to Be White" for people who are proud of being white?
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
US Steel workers see hope of job security in deal with Japan’s Nippon - Financial Times
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
What are some ways to help bring out natural curly/wavy hair?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Thank you.
What are the differences between red and blue LED lights for skin treatment?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
What’s next?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.